Theme change!

Beautiful isolated boxes on a moody “silo” background is all fair and well, until that theme prevents one from viewing a) a complete photo, or b) the entirety of a text post.

No offence to the author of “silo”, I really do think it’s beautiful, but function must come above form just now so I’m switching. This move will probably be temporary … but it may not … and I dare say nobody gives a toss either way. View through your own dashboard or via the RSS feed like the rest of the 2.0 world.

The Kepler Mission - wow

So I’m listening to episode #212 of the SGU and apparently - this is mental, right - the Kepler Mission, a NASA telescope launched earlier this year, is so sensitive that it can detect the change in light coming from distant stars as planets that pass around the star cause the total light coming from the system to change.

I can’t do that in one sentence; allow me to expand. Imagine a star. It beams out light. If there are no planets around that star, in theory the amount of light reaching us stays mostly constant. We can thus infer that “there are no planets there”. Easy (and boring).

Now picture a planet orbiting that star. As it passes in front, it blocks some of the light; we thus infer the (interesting) conclusion, that is “there is a planet orbiting that star” (and, pretty please, there might be life on it).

In its simplest sense then, the Kepler type of mission looks for the reduction in light reaching the Earth as the now-detected planet passes in front of its star. The planet casts a shadow on the Earth, if you like (albeit a miniscule one).

We can detect that. That’s pretty cool. We can’t be talking more than thousands of photons a second, surely. (“Citation needed” and all that. I’ll do the research.)

But wait! Kepler can do more. Kepler can actually detect the phases of the planet as it orbits its star, so much so that when the planet passes behind its star (so that it would be invisible to us, if we could resolve that amount of detail (which we can’t)) the amount of light from the star actually appears to reduce.

Why would it reduce when the planet passes behind the star? Well, when the planet is alongside the star - picture it to the left or right - it reflects some of the light from that star. When it goes behind the star, no more reflection.

Kepler is sensitive enough to detect this extra little bit of light. Oh, and by the way, it monitors about 100,000 stars. At the same time.

Astronomy is an astonishing, humbling science.

Update: and of course this stuff doesn’t just appear overnight. The planet has to orbit its star at least twice for us to know that this is a regular, normal, planetary transition and not some anomaly. We need the light to dim (first time), then dim again (second time), then dim again (third time), and for the time between the first and the second to be the same as the time between the second and the third. Get it? And bear in mind that this extrasolar planet’s orbit may be way, way longer than our Earth’s. A year is only a year on Earth.

Mental.

I spotted this a while ago on the pavement in East Melbourne.
Somebody has drip-painted the word “happy” on the pavement by a parking meter. I’ve seen the same word in the same script at least one other place; alas, I can’t remember where.
Why wouldn’t you live in a city where people did that?

I spotted this a while ago on the pavement in East Melbourne.

Somebody has drip-painted the word “happy” on the pavement by a parking meter. I’ve seen the same word in the same script at least one other place; alas, I can’t remember where.

Why wouldn’t you live in a city where people did that?

minimalmac:

I use my keyboard for commands, with shortcuts and QuickSilver. By removing the Dock I’ve become more focused on single tasks - not distracted by open applications. It’s like a real desk with as few areas of focus as possible.
(still hoping for the DropBox crew to enable hiding their menu bar icon)

Agreed. I quit Dropbox because I don’t want the icon there. No need.

minimalmac:

I use my keyboard for commands, with shortcuts and QuickSilver. By removing the Dock I’ve become more focused on single tasks - not distracted by open applications. It’s like a real desk with as few areas of focus as possible.

(still hoping for the DropBox crew to enable hiding their menu bar icon)

Agreed. I quit Dropbox because I don’t want the icon there. No need.

Reblogged from minimalmac

samwiselee:
Ugly yet impressive
Wicked … saw this on my iPhone screen and thought, eh, cool. Saw this just now on my Mac and all of a sudden there’s this weird freaky shit going on.
And is that a chance reflection on the left or is that meant to look like a torch beam coming out of the left cup?… The plane continues along the table and presents the image of the whole scene being lit from within; very cool.

samwiselee:

Ugly yet impressive

Wicked … saw this on my iPhone screen and thought, eh, cool. Saw this just now on my Mac and all of a sudden there’s this weird freaky shit going on.

And is that a chance reflection on the left or is that meant to look like a torch beam coming out of the left cup?… The plane continues along the table and presents the image of the whole scene being lit from within; very cool.

Reblogged from armher

completeunkown:
I LOVE DAVID LYNCH.
Crazy image. Love the high-tone shot, love the detail in the beard and the eyes and forehead, love the monochromacity (I made up my own suffix (or did I, that may even be a word?)), love the sense of “what’s he looking at?” … just love the portrait. Great shot of a crazy man (whose work, I’ll confess, I’m not that in to).

completeunkown:

I LOVE DAVID LYNCH.

Crazy image. Love the high-tone shot, love the detail in the beard and the eyes and forehead, love the monochromacity (I made up my own suffix (or did I, that may even be a word?)), love the sense of “what’s he looking at?” … just love the portrait. Great shot of a crazy man (whose work, I’ll confess, I’m not that in to).

I’d love to imagine that this photo wasn’t staged. Now I have to go off and read Kerouak.
expectingtofly:

brokenmachine:
magic-carpet:   run away already on Flickr - Photo Shari…

I’d love to imagine that this photo wasn’t staged. Now I have to go off and read Kerouak.

expectingtofly:

brokenmachine:

magic-carpet: run away already on Flickr - Photo Shari…

Reblogged from magic-carpet

I think you’re amazing. We should be together…

— 

samwiselee, to me yesterday

(this may not be entirely true)

Atmosphr is a snob Tumblr is not a one way stream

samwiselee:

I didnt realise when I signed up to Tumblr that it was a web forum for the thoughts of John, AKA Atmosphr.

Didn’t you? Hang on, let me get that email I wrote you.

From: john
To: fanclub@atmosphr
Subject: Me
Hey Sam, I don't feel like you hear enough about my life so I'm going to set up a blog just so I can tell you more about myself and all the interesting things I do. I just know this will enrich your life.

So that’s odd. What are you complaining about? Jeebas.

Reblogged from armher